You Shall Surely Die...Part 3 of 3

‘You shall surely die’ isn’t defined by the text as the breath leaving the body.  Instead, the text defines this phrase as a form of exile from nearness to the el (God...mighty one), from being in a state of affinity with the el.  This is another place where bias clouds what is actually written, most people think that ‘you shall surely die’ means the breath leaves your body. Or worse, is forcibly taken from your body by one more righteous than you!  This is the basis for many ‘holy wars’.


This bias, this misunderstanding of how this phrase is defined by the text, also extends to how most people interpret how Israel was to punish its members who defiantly rejected the boundaries … according to the definition God gave at the beginning, it meant they were to be driven away like Cain was driven away, it didn't mean they were to be executed.   As well, the Canaanites were to be driven off the land, not executed.  Exodus 23:28-31; 33:2; 34:11; Numbers 32:21; 33:52, 55; Deuteronomy 11:23; Joshua 3:10; 13:6 … and more all say this.  Stop right here and look it up!

God punished Cain for his murder of Abel with this kind of 'death'.  To Cain, this was a punishment almost too hard to bear.  The teaching is: if you observe the boundaries, you remain within the community influenced by ‘el’, the one who purposed it.  If you reject the boundaries, you are rejected by the life-enhancing community, you are exiled, consigned to wander.

Reading through the history of Israel as recorded in the Prophets…it seems that the purpose of this exile wasn’t a final cutting off (death as we usually understand it), but instead an opportunity to repent and be restored.

It’s interesting that Israel rarely did this.  Adam and Eve are never recorded as being repentant, and neither is Cain, though he certainly does seem upset by the punishment. 

Doesn’t it fit within the context that the purpose of exile (the punishment of ‘death’) is to restrict rebellion from contaminating the community, as well as to provide opportunity for the exiled one to repent and be restored?

And when all these things come upon you, the blessing and the curse, which I have set before you, and you call them to mind among all the nations where the LORD your God has driven you, and return to the LORD your God, you and your children, and obey his voice in all that I command you today, with all your heart and with all your soul, then the LORD your God will restore your fortunes and have compassion on you, and he will gather you again from all the peoples where the LORD your God has scattered (exiled) you. Deuteronomy 30:1-3

What Does the Bible Teach? Part 2 of 3

The short answer is: a lot!  It's not too complicated or difficult to understand ... really!

It’s important to let the words of the Bible speak for themselves; to read and study it outside of a dogmatic (meaning holding certain principles as incontrovertibly true) perspective, otherwise you may be adding bias.   Christianity has certain foundational beliefs that influence how a christian perceives what s/he reads, even what s/he considers ‘the Bible’.  Judaism does too.  Even humanism and atheism can be dogmatic, as they also include a bias. 

It’s really hard to read without a bias!  It’s pretty much human nature to want to believe we have things quite figured out, and so we tend to read looking more for confirmation for our own beliefs, than reading to discover.

Here are some things I’ve discovered in my own study, that I didn’t know before:

Genesis 1 doesn’t actually say that God created the world out of nothing.  It uses language to say he ‘formed and filled’ a shapeless mass.  It neither says God made the original mass … nor does it say he doesn’t.  Its focus is instead that God’s word (think ‘law’) caused actions, which made something formerly without use or purpose … useful and purposeful.  It can be seen as a teaching that this is what mankind (who carries the ‘image’ of God) is also to do … to act according to God’s word, to ‘cultivate’ what was received, to keep and maintain it, to bring out its purpose.

These first few chapters of Genesis also teach that God gives freedom (you may eat of any tree in the garden…this included the ‘tree of life) yet within boundaries (but not of the tree that is in the middle of the garden).  This wasn’t a hard thing to do.  It didn’t require ‘faith’ or ‘belief’ it required trust that God meant what he said, the kind of trust that would result in an action of voluntarily remaining within the boundary.  The ‘six days work, seventh day rest’ is also a boundary, this one on time and authourity.

It’s not hard to understand, in looking around us at creation, that we didn’t make it; that instead we received it.  It came from outside us.  In reading through history, there are no claims that mankind or any other creature created itself or anything else.  Neither historical or current evidence offers anything  different.

The idea that creation ‘evolved’ through a process requires too much blind faith, faith that isn’t supported by evidence.  If someone leaves a mess in a room, even many years later, it’s still a mess in a room.  What is in the room is more likely to have ‘devolved’ into more basic components than ‘evolved’ into something greater.  It requires even blinder faith to believe that somehow a process of ‘evolution’ also just happened to end up with a creation that works together so marvelously. And not only works together, but acts according to some sort of pattern, some sort of predetermined order.  There is significant and logical evidence for a Creator.

So what’s written in these first few chapters of Genesis as a ‘given’ makes logical sense.  A power (an ‘el’ in Hebrew, a mighty one) formed and filled and ordered things to run the way they do, according to a planned purpose. To me, this makes the most sense, that this writing is referring to that mighty power outside ‘us’, outside even the universe (as even the universe is subject to it).  One way to understand these chapters is to see the point primarily as being to introduce the order of creation, the purpose within which things are intended to be managed.

Mankind is intended to be the ruler of creation, as the ‘el’ is the ruler of mankind.  If the purpose of the el is to produce, to cultivate and to enhance, to manage benevolently, then this should be the purpose of mankind.

But there is a choice given to humanity, that isn’t given to any of the other creatures.  This choice is to willingly submit to this order … or not to.  Consequences are given for both actions.  ‘You shall surely die’ if you turn away.  And instead of trusting the el, humanity trusted in the interpretation of a created being.  And they ‘died’.  More on that in the next post…